a rose is a rose whatever name is given to it This is just my opinion and people may/will agree/disagree with me.

May I, therefore, request you to think about renaming the 'queen' to the 'minister' to make it more commonly/logically accepted. That is why in the sub-continent is it the 'minister' and not the 'queen' is responsible for such job. It was true when the chess was invented hundreds (may be thousands) of years ago and it is still true in modern days. Even now-a-days lady PMs, who are the real power-source in a state, do not fight it is the war/defence ministers who do the job. I know there are many Kings in modern world whose Queens are the real monarchs but these queens do not fight wars for their idle kings. A 'queen' is fighting with all her subordinates to defend the king and the 'king' is just enjoying the fight and trying to escape his capture when threantened! What an unrealistic practice and a shame on the part of the 'king'. I wonder why the most important piece in chess was named the 'Queen' ! In Indian sub-continent it is called the 'Minister' (may be war/defence minister). I have comparatively recently joined, though chess was one time my #1 game.

Original chess piece names